![\"\"](\"http:\/\/historyoftech.mcclurken.org\/mouse\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/The_Apple_Mouse-evolution-1024x766-e1491263432166.jpg\")
<\/a>\u201cThe how many buttons does your mouse have poll.\u201d Digital Image. McNeel Forums. August, 2016. March 16, 2017.https:\/\/discourse.mcneel.com\/t\/the-how-many-buttons-has-your-mouse-got-poll\/36300\/11<\/p><\/div>\n
The original design for the mouse was mechanically designed by Engelbart, however made\u00a0into tangible form\u00a0by his colleague Bill English. English\u2019s prototype featured a large wooden box that could fit in the palm of one’s hand, a button for selecting images on the screen near the top, and in the words of \u00a0Paul Atkinson,”wheels attached to internal potentiometers\u201d [1]. First made of wood, this design was expensive and difficult to reproduce. Therefore, as Engelbart was designing his \u201ctext based operating system\u201d called \u201cAugment\u201d, he and English instead offered up a \u201cthree-button mouse\u201d to accompany the system in 1968, made of plastic [2]. However, since most text based programs were falling out of vogue, and icon-based operating systems became increasingly popular, the mouse earned its new purpose for being a point and click device\u00a0[3]. At this point in time, 1971, Bill English, as well as mouse research and development \u201cleft the Stanford Research Institute to join Xerox\u201d [4]. While there, \u201cEnglish worked with Jack Hawley, developing a version which replaced two wheels of his first mouse prototype with a single steel ball\u2026to execute point-and-click operations\u201d [5]. The steel ball allowed for a wider range and freedom of movement as the cursor navigated the icons on the computer screens. Nevertheless, this mouse model was far from perfect. Not only was it highly expensive to produce, \u201cbetween $350 to $400,\u201d they were also far too difficult to mass produce because \u201cthe interior steel ball\u2026had to be precisely aligned with internal rollers and springs\u201d, which required individual hand constructed care [6]. Not to mention, dirt could also get trapped in the rolling ball and ruin the mouse\u2019s ability to function properly. If the mouse wanted to have a shot at ever being an accessible piece of technology, there would need to be a major change in design and materials. That is exactly what Apple Computers strove to do.<\/p>\n
Steve Jobs showed great initial interest in the mouse as a possible piece of technology to accompany his computers, however their traditional designs and materials had often made them far too expensive and difficult to replicate on a mass scale.According to Stanford graduate Alex Soojung-Kim Pang, Jobs enlisted the help of \u201ctwo-year-old start up\u201d Hovey-Kelley Design Team to create a mouse that was cheaper and simpler to produce [7]. Some of the revisions they made to the Xerox mouse was the replacement of the \u201cload-bearing steel ball\u201d with a \u201cfloating lead ball covered in rubber\u201d, an injection-molded \u201crib cage\u201d which located and held all of the key components of the mouse together in their precise locations [8], and the reduction of the \u201cnumber of buttons from three to one\u201d[9]. The key to the ease of mass-producing this mouse was the idea that this \u2018ribcage\u2019 could be \u201cmass produced\u201d, once \u201cthe mold was made\u2026to the exacting tolerances\u2026for pennies a unit\u201d [10]. Instead of costing a couple hundred dollars to produce the computer mouse, it now cost less than $20 [11]. The mouse had finally been given a viable shot at becoming a part of our everyday lives.<\/p>\n
Over time, other companies such as Logitech and Evoluent have sought out ways to create a better, more ergonomically structured mouse design. While Apple stayed true to its \u201crectilinear forms\u201d, their competitors were looking for better ways to address the rising issue of Repetitive Stress Injury in avid computer users [12]. Some examples of alternative designs for the mouse include the \u201cEvoluent Vertical Mouse\u201d with buttons and scroll wheel on the right side, preventing the user’s arm from having “to twist to use the mouse\u201d [13]. Another modification included the Logitech \u201ctrackball mouse\u201d which is a stationary mouse with\u00a0the buttons of a regular mouse but with a trackball controlled by the user’s thumb\u00a0[14]. Despite the major design modifications that these companies have attempted to make to the mouse, they still represent the basic tenants of ‘inexpensive’ and ‘easy to mass produce’ that was established in the design of the Apple mouse years ago.<\/p>\n
<\/a>Herrman, John. \u201cLogitech Timeline of Mousery.\u201d Digital Image. Gizmodo. Dec 3, 2008. March 16, 2017.https:\/\/www.gizmodo.com.au\/2008\/12\/logitech_timeline_of_mousery_is_full_of_memories_logitech_advertising-2\/<\/p><\/div>\n
For most people, this story of how the mouse was designed is never heard. All too often, it is only a part of the larger computer machine, rather than an independent entity. However, this fact that the mouse is so easily forgotten is considered a success. Jim Sachs, one of the founders of Hovey-Kelley, commented that \u201cit\u2019s the peculiar fate of good design to erase traces of itself; bad design is far more noticeable\u201d [15]. With this idea in mind, the mouse continues to connect both young and old to the digital world through the most organic motion of point-and-click.<\/p>\n
Footnotes: Since the mouse\u2019s initial development in the early 1960\u2019s, it has been constantly undergoing changes that have enabled its style to evolve with the times. The mouse has grown into a natural feature of the computer desk, right next to the keyboard and monitor. As we all know them today, computer mice are characteristically made of plastic, even though\u00a0this was not the case initially. As the mouse\u2019s design was amended<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-112","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-future"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/historyoftech.mcclurken.org\/mouse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/112","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/historyoftech.mcclurken.org\/mouse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/historyoftech.mcclurken.org\/mouse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historyoftech.mcclurken.org\/mouse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historyoftech.mcclurken.org\/mouse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=112"}],"version-history":[{"count":21,"href":"https:\/\/historyoftech.mcclurken.org\/mouse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/112\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":277,"href":"https:\/\/historyoftech.mcclurken.org\/mouse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/112\/revisions\/277"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/historyoftech.mcclurken.org\/mouse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=112"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historyoftech.mcclurken.org\/mouse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=112"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historyoftech.mcclurken.org\/mouse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=112"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\n1. Paul Atkinson. \u201cThe Best Laid Plans of Mice and Men: The Computer Mouse in the History of Computing.\u201d Design Issues<\/em> 23, no. 3 (Summer 2007): 49-61,47.
\n2.Ibid, 48.
\n3.Ibid, 49.
\n4.Ibid, 50.
\n5.Ibid, 50.
\n6.Ibid, 51.
\n7. Alex Soojung-Kim Pang. \u201cMighty Mouse.\u201d Stanford Magazine,March\/April 2002. Accessed February 20, 2017. https:\/\/alumni.stanford.edu\/get\/page\/magazine\/article\/?article_id=37694<\/a>
\n8.Paul Atkinson. “The Best Laid Plans of Mice and Men: The Computer Mouse in the History of Computing.”, 51.
\n9. Alex Soojung-Kim Pang. \u201cMighty Mouse.\u201d
\n10. Ibid.
\n11. Paul Atkinson. “The Best Laid Plans of Mice and Men: The Computer Mouse in the History of Computing.”, 51.
\n12. Ibid, 52.
\n13. Katie Beaver, Mohit Mehendale, Cy Abdelnour, and Curtis Sawdon. \u201cDesigning an Ergonomic Computer Mouse.\u201d Univeristy of Michigan, 2011. Accessed March 16, 2017.\u00a0http:\/\/umich.edu\/~desci501\/2011\/Team10\/APD11_T10_FINALREPORT.pdf<\/a>, 4.
\n14. Ibid, 5.
\n15. Alex Soojung-Kim Pang.”Mighty Mouse.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"